What does social host liability mean? This is a legal concept that many states are following now. It allows a host of a party or a particular gathering be held liable when a situation occurs with one of his or her guests that may become intoxicated while in their home and ends up becoming injured by another party.
The social host liability is somewhat similar to the dram shop laws. The only difference is the imposing liability of alcoholic beverages like bars or liquor stores to resume responsibility for alcoholic beverages that play a factor in another individual’s injury.
Who Can Be Held Liable?
Normally when the laws are applied correctly, homeowners, property renters or other individuals who provide alcohol to guests at their home and the guests become drunk and receive an injury can be difficult to provide proof of who is actually responsible because that individual could have arrived at the party drunk. If the individual is under the drinking age of twenty-one, he or she should be asked to leave a party that is serving alcohol instead of invited in because that would have eliminated the home owner from becoming responsible for injuries that occurred.
Who Can Sue?
You may be wondering who can have the responsibility of suing another individual in a social host event. If you are in a situation where you are visiting someone’s home and an injury was caused while you were in that home, then you can file a personal injury claim with the assistance of a personal injury lawyer in Georgetown.
Proving Liability
It is important to note that social host liabilities cases are not always simple and it is not always easy to provide proof of negligence which is what you need to do in order to provide proof that someone was negligent when the injury occurred. While social host liability can be proven, it is still not a straight-forward case, unless you have all the details and a few eye witnesses that was not under the influence of alcohol when the injury occurred.
Recklessness and Negligence
When an individual becomes injured in a home after substantial warnings that something is unsafe or what they are doing is not safe, then the claim can be argued, especially if there was others that heard the warnings as well and witnessed you not listening to the home owner. Reckless driving that caused a car accident will also fall in this section. If someone is driving 70 mph in a zone that is 25 mph, then this is negligent especially, if someone is injured due to this high rate of speed and the ultimate defiance of the speed laws. It is fairly simple really.