If the negotiations with the insurance company stall, the person that has submitted a claim might want to consider filing a lawsuit. That action could help to get the case moving in the right direction.
The outcome of a personal injury case depends on the quality of the evidence.
If a claimant were to become a plaintiff, and that same plaintiff could present good evidence, then the court might feel that the plaintiff’s reward should be rather large. A claimant can become a plaintiff by filing a lawsuit. The claimants have better luck with amassing good evidence if they have filed a lawsuit and have hired an injury lawyer in Richmond Hill.
Lawsuits provide claimants with a way to get money for their pain and suffering.
An insurance company does not compensate a claimant for pain and suffering. The company simply estimates those costs and sticks that estimate into a formula. Someone that has initiated a lawsuit has the chance to go after reimbursement for future medical expenses, or for the sudden disruption of a satisfying lifestyle.
How egregious was the act that caused the accident victim’s injury?
Lawsuits provide victims with the chance to face the responsible party in court. That court might decide to award the plaintiff/victim punitive damages.
A lawsuit’s benefits must be weighed against the known risks.
As indicated, pursuit of that legal action normally calls for the hiring of a lawyer. Personal injury lawyers charge a contingency fee. That means that the client must pay a hired attorney some percentage of any money that he or she receives. When lawyers need to spend many hours in a courtroom, then their requested percentage increases.
Taking a case to court does not guarantee a win. The plaintiff could lose. In a personal injury case, a plaintiff’s loss would mean that some injured victim had not received any form of reimbursement for his or her losses.
Even winning a case does not always ensure the prompt delivery of awarded money. The other side could decide to seek an appeal hearing. That could increase the amount of time that it would take for the plaintiff’s award to make it to the office of the plaintiff’s attorney.
Moreover, there would be no guarantee that an appeals court would uphold the original verdict. It might decide to overrule that particular verdict. If that were to be the case, then the defendant would win, and the opposing side would not get any money. Alternatively, an appeals court might order a new trial. That would mean that the plaintiff would have to wait even longer for any possible funds that could cover the accumulating expenses. Not many claimants take on such risks. You decide what move seems wisest.